建筑分馆

哈工大图书馆建筑学学科服务博客

« 20世纪重要建筑史学家及其著作哈工大“Project Blue”获eVolo2014摩天大楼竞赛鼓励奖 »

中国台湾大学博士课程“建筑史与都市史”书单

     中国台湾大学建筑与城乡研究所“建筑史与都市史”课程参考文献目录

    Graduate Institute of Building and Planning Spring 2009
    National Taiwan University C.J.Hsia

    這是個兩學期的課程,主要提供為有關建築史與都市史的博士班學生之方法論方面的討論課程。我們將討論建築史與都市史之成長、目標、工具與研究方法。主要內容包括這領域的主要文獻、主要概念(像建築風格、建築中的道德規範、時代精神、建築為文化的表現、社會結構之歷史過程的都市意義的表現)、重要史學及其代表之學派、建築史與實踐之關係、建築之理論與批評,以及相關的諸學域如考古學、社會學、人類系、都市地理學與藝術史等。上學期大部分集中於建築史的理論與調查,下學期則集中於都市史的理論與方法。

    0. Preliminary Reading (課前準備)

    夏鑄九,1993,“營造學社—梁思成建築史論述構造之理論分析”,《空間,歷史與社會》,台北:台灣社會研究叢刊—03,頁1-49。
    卡爾‧馬克斯,1852,“路易‧波拿巴的霧月十八日”,《馬克斯恩格斯選集》,第一卷,北京:人民出版社,1994,頁:579-670。(注意文中對階級意識與農民問題的處理)。
    (1) Hobsbawm, E., On History, London: New Press, 1998.(有中譯)
    (2) Jenkins, K., Re-thinking History, London: Routledge, 1991.(有中譯)
    (3) Jenkins, K., On 'What is History?', London: Routledge, 1995. (有中譯)
    (4) Preziosi, D., Rethinking Art History, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.

    I. Introduction: The History of Architectural History (導論:建築史的歷史)
    The remarks deal with a broad background. They should be supplemented by specific accounts of historiography, esp.

    (1)  * Watkin, D., The Rise of Architectural History, London, 1980.
    (2) Liang, A.K. and E.C. Rae, "The Founding and First Years of the Society of Architectural Historians from 1940", JSAH, Vol.XLIX, No.7-8, March 1990, pp.7-8.
    (3) Overby, O., "From 1947: The Society of Architectural Historians", JSAH, Vol.XLIX, No.7-8, March 1990, pp.9-14.
    (4) Maass, J., "Where Architectural Historians Fear to Tread", Society of Architectural Historian, Vol.XXVIII, No.1, March 1969.
    (5) Poppeliers, J.C., "Historiographic Development in the History of Architecture", Catholic University of America Dissertation, Washington DC 1975.
    (6) Hsia, Chu-joe, 2002, 10, “The Paradigm Shift in the Education of Architecture and Planning in the Global Information Age”, Keynote Speech Paper for 2002 Seoul International Conference on East Asian Architectural History - Traditional Architecture in modern Asia (TAmA), The Korean Association of Architectural History, Seoul, October 17-19, 2002.
    (7) 夏鑄九,2004,12,“關於歷史與理論:研究與教學”,設計研究的回顧與前瞻研討會,設計史論專題部分主持人論文,國科會人文處藝術學門主辦,雲林科技大學承辦,2004年12月18日。

    初步認識建築史本身論述的歷史形構(the historical formation of the discourse of architectural history)是本週的主題,建議試著由建築史的角度思考更貼身的困境:現代建築是在什麼脈絡下在近代亞洲建構的?以及,面對當前的全球資訊化趨勢下建築與規劃教育的範型轉移,亞洲的建築教育,以至於建築史教育要如何因應?然後,由下週開始建築史論述實踐中的抵抗與反省軌跡。

    II. What is Architectural History? (什麼是建築史?)

    (1) * Wright, G., and J. Parks, eds. The History of History in American Schools of Architecture 1865-1975, Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press, 1990.
    (2) * Kubler, G., The Shape of Time, New Haven, 1962.
    (3) Kubler, G., "What Can Historians do for Architecture?", in Perspecta, 9/10, 1965, pp.299-302.
    (4) Kubler, G., "The Shape of Time Reconsidered", Perspecta, No.19, 1982, pp.112-121.
    (5) Whiffen, M.m ed. The History, Theory and Criticism of Architecture, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1970.
    (6) Hancock, J.E., ed. History in of and for Architecture, Cincinnati, 1981.
    (7) Collins, P., Changing Ideals in Modern Architecture, Montreal 1965.
    (8) * Allsopp, B., The Study of Architectural History, New York, 1970.[註:書中所提希羅多德(Herodotus)的歷史(Historiae)已有中譯,王以鑄譯,台北:台灣商務]
    (9) Conway, H., and R. Roenisch, Understanding Architecture: An Introduction to Architecture and Architectural History, London: Routledge, 1994. (ch.3)
    (10) Arnold, Dana, Reading Architectural History, London: Routledge 2002. (Ch.1)
    (11) * Porphyrios, D., ed. On the Methodology of Architectural History, London, 1981.(pp.2, 3-10, 61-68, 96-104)
    (12) * Tafuri, M., Theories and History of Architecture, London, 1980. (Italian Original 1976)
    (13) La storia dell'architettura, problemi di metodo e di didattica, Atti del convegno nazionale 1974, published by the Istituto di storia dell'architettura dell'Universita degli studi Firenze in 1976.

    The discussion will consider the relation of architectural history and the general discipline of history, the traditional practices and goals of architectural historians, the present state and future thrusts of the field. This is by way of introduction to the more detailed study of schools of architectural history which will engage us in subsequent weeks.
    首先,看看美國的建築學院的歷史,以及,建築史教育與建築教育的關係與自主性的建構,我們以耶魯建築史為例,看看Kubler的考古學知識角色。最後,看看建築史本身的論述內容,以及緊接著,在1970年代社會動力下學院的建築史家的反思。

    王敏穎,“建築史在西方與中國專業學院中的定位——從十八世紀迄今”(Architectural History in Western and Chinese Professional Schools: from the Eighteenth Century to the Present),《台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所學報》。(即將出版)

    III. Basic Documents of Architectural History (建築史的基本文獻)
    Based on a case study, we will discuss the visual and literary documents from which architectural history is composed. The list includes: the building fabric itself; primary documents such as drawings, models, contracts, commemorative medals, letters, inscriptions; secondary documents such as travel accounts, vedute, manuals of iconography.

    (1) * Kostof, S., ed. The Architect: Chapters in the History of the Profession, New York, 1977.
    (2) Wilton-Ely, J., "The Architectural Model: English Baroque", Apollo, No.88, 1968.
    (3) Narjoux, F., Monuments eleves par la ville de Paris de 1985 a 1880, Paris, 1877-81; and Haussmann, E., Memories, Paris 1890.
    (4) Kuthmann, H., et al., Bauten Roms auf Munzen und Medaillen, Munich, 1973; and a related volume, Donaldson, T.L., Architectura numismatica; or, Architectural Medals of Classical Antique, London, 1895.
    (5) Bloch, H.I., bolli laterrizi e la storia edilizia romana, Rome 1947: the classic study of Roma brick stamps.
    (6) Hyman, Isabelle, Fifteenth Century Florentine Studies: The Palazzo Medici and A Ledger for the Church of San Lorenzo, New York, 1977.
    (7) Bundgaard, J.A., Mnesicles, A Greek Architect at Work, Copenhagen 1957: building inscriptions concerning the Telesterion at Eleusis and the Arsenal at Piraeus.
    (8) Peroni, ed., Annli della fabbrica del Duomo di Milano, Milan 1877-85; reprinted 1979.
    (9) Arnold, Dana, Reading Architectural History, London: Routledge 2002. (Ch.2)
    (10) 楊鴻勛,《建築考古學論文集》,北京:文物出版社,1987。
    (11) 劉敘杰主編,《中國古代建築史》,第一卷,北京:中國建築工業出版社,2003。
    (12) 劉敘杰等,《中國古代建築》,台北:木馬,2003。(繁體字版)

    IV. Reconstruction and Restoration (重建與修復)
    The recreation of architectural reality on the basis of literary descriptions, conceptual drawings, and material remains. Individual reports will focus on one famous instance and review the issues involved, the history of the problem, the nature of the results.

    (1) Horn, W., and E. Born, The Plan of St. Gall, 3 vols, Berkeley, 1979.
    (2) O'Gorman,J., Henry Hobson Richarson and His Office, Boston, 1975; and O'Gorman's article in the JSAH, No.37, Oct. 1978, pp.175-194: Richardson's Marshall Field Store in Chicago.
    (3) Downey, G., "On Some Post-Classical Architectural Terms", Transactions of the American Philological Association, No.77, 1946, pp.22-34. ( problems presented by architectural terms in literary texts)
    (4) * To this discussion belongs also the thorny issue of architectural restoration: Knossos, Ostia, Pompeii, Williamsburg. You might look up the entry on "Restoration" in The Encyclopedia of World Art: the issue of architectural restoration on Knossos, Osttia, Pompeii, Williamsburg, etc. and thinking of Evans, Viollet-le-Duc, even the Getty Museum.
    (5) 閱讀:陳志梧,1988,“空間變遷的社會歷史分析:以日本殖民時期的宜蘭地景為個案”,台灣大學土木研究所博士論文。(特別注意附錄,清葛瑪蘭成的復原)
    (6) 閱讀:楊鴻勛,1987,《建築考古學論文集》,北京:文物出版社。
    (7) 楊鴻勛,1997,“唐長安大明宮含元殿復原再論”, 《城市與設計》,第一期,6月,頁75-102。
    (8) 傅熹年,1973,“唐長安大明宮含元殿復原的探討”, 《文物》,第七期。
    (9) 傅熹年,1998,《傅熹年建築史論文集》,北京:文物出版社。

    V. Methods of Architectural History (建築史方法)
    1. The Aesthetic/ Formalist Approach (美學/形式主義取向)
    1.1. Style. 風格

    (1)  * Lang, Berel, eds. The Concept of Style, 1979.
    (2) * Ackerman, J.S., “Style”, Art and Archaeology, 1963, pp.164- 186. ( and “Postscript”, 1991)
    (3) * Gombrich, E.H., entry on Style in The International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.
    (4) * Schapiro, M., “Style”, Anthropology Today, A.L. Kroeber ed., 1953, pp.287-312; reprinted in Aesthetic Today, M. Philipson ed., 1961, pp.81-113.
    (5) * Frankl, P., “The ‘Crazy’ Vaults of Lincoln Cathedral” Art Bulletin, No.35, 1953, pp.95-108: good methodological arguments against a determinist development of style. Ref.:Frankl's textbook and Kostof's article on Frankl:
    (6) Frankl, P., Principles of Architectural History, first published as Die Entwicklungphasen der neueren Baukunst. First English translation, 1932.
    (7) Kostof, S., “Paul Frankl's Principles of Architectural History”, in Porphirios, D., ed., On the Methodology of Architectural History, 1981, pp.21-24.

    Seminal texts (开创性的文献):
    (1) * Wolffin, H., Principles of Art History, 1932. (German Original 1915).
    (2) * Facillon, H., Vie des formes, 1934, translated as The Life Form in Art, New York, 1942, by Hogan and Kubler.
    You should also be aware of Wolfflin's predecessors and contemporaries, e.g. Adolf Goller (Entstehung der architectonischen Stilformen, 1888, or the slightly earlier Zur Aesthetik der Architektur), Gottfried Semper, the great Alois Riegl (Stilfragen, 1893), or the so called "formalist" school of art history Emil Kaufmann who remains untranslateded into English. ref.:Rkywert, J., “Gottfroed Semper and the Problem of Style”,Quintavalle, A.C., "The Philosophical Context of Riegl's Stilfragen",Teyssot, G., "Neoclassic and 'Autonomous' Architecture: The Formalism of Emil Kaufmann". 
    (3)Hubsch, Heinrich, et al., In What Style Should we Build?: The German Debate on Architectural Style, 1992.
    (4) Poppeliers, J. et al., What Style Is It?, 1976.
    And there is a lot of recent material you ought to be familiar with, e.g. Finch, M., Style in Art History, 1974; or the recent reformulation of the formalist approach by Arnkeim, R., The Dynamics of Architectural Form, Berkeley, 1977; compare also with:
    * Twombly, R., Power and Style: A Critique of Twentieth- Century Architecture in the United States, New York: Hill and Wang, 1995.
    * Hebdige, D., Subculture: The Meaning of Style, London, 1979.

    先認識建築史論述中對風格的界定,什麼是風格?以及,是在甚麼脈絡下定義風格?然後,以二十世紀美國建築為例,思考風格與權力的關係,更進一步,在認識論層次上,比較文化研究中對風格的不同界定並做進一討論!

     1.2. Space; Einfuhlung (empathy) ( 空間,神入)

    (1)* Zevi, B., Architecture as Space, 1957; see also his entry on "Architecture" in the Encyckopedia of World Art.
    (2) * Scott, G., The Architecture of Humanism, first pub. 1924.

    Additional references:
    (3) Van de Venm C.J.M., "Concerning the Idea of Space: The Rise of A New Fundamental in German Architectural Theory and in the Modern Movement until 1930", Univ. of Pennsylvania dissertation 1974.
    (4) * Zucker, P., "The Paradox of Architectural Theories at the Beginning of the Modern Movement", JSAH, V.10, N.3, 1951, pp.8- 14.
    (5) Lipps, Theodor, Raumaesthetik und geometrisch-optische Tauschungen, 1897; Scott's predecessor.
    (6) Scruton, R., The Aesthetics of Architecture, Princeton 1979.
    (7) Norberg-Schulz, C., Existence, Space and Architecture, 1971.
    (8) Baird, G., The Space of Appearance, 1995.
    (9) Etlin, R.A. Symbolic Space: French Enlightenment Architecture and Its Legacy, 1994.

    * See also the entries on "production of space", "space", "spatial structure", and "spatiality" in The Dictionary of Human Geography, 4th Edition, 2000.
    * Sack, R.D., Conceptions of Space in Social Thought: A Geographic Perspective, 1980.
    * Buttimer, A., and D. Seaman, The Human Experience of Space and Place, 1980.
    * Tuan, Y.F., Space and Place, 1974.
    * Lefebvre, Henri, Production of Space, Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.

    先認識建築史論述中對空間的界定,什麼是空間?以及,是在甚麼脈絡下定義空間?然後,比較地理學、現象學或是新人文地理學、以及社會理論對空間的理論建構,注意空間生產、空間、空間結構與空間性的概念界定。

    1. 3. Typology (Architectonics) (類型學)

    (1)  * Argan, G.C., "Typology", Enciclopedia Universale dell'Arte 1, Vol.XIV, Venice: Fondazione Cini.
    (2) * Vidler, A., "The Third Typology", Oppositions, No.7, 1976.
    (3) Pevsner, N., A History of Building Type, 1976.
    (4) * Moneo, R., "On Typology", Oppositions, No.13, 1978.
    (5) * Calquhoun, A.,"Typology and Design Method", Arena, No.83, 1976.
    (6) * Casabelella, "The Grounds of Typology", Casabella, No.509- 510, Jan./Feb. 1995, special issue.
    (7) * Bandini, N., "Typological Theories in Architectural Design", in B. Farmer and H. Louw, eds., Companion to Contemporary Architectural Thought, 1993.
    (8) * Vidler, A., "The Idea of Type", Oppositions, No.8, Spring 1977.
    (9) Vidler, A., "The Third Typology", Oppositions, No.7, Winter, 1976.
    (10) Vidler, A., "From the Hut to the Temple: Quatremere De Quincy and the Idea of Type", in A., Vidler, Writing of the Walls, 1987.
    (11) * Porphyrios, D., "The End of 'Styles'", Oppositions, No.8, Spring, 1977.
    (12) * Guillerme, J., "The Idea of Architectural Language: A Critical Inquiry", Oppositions, No.110, 1977.
    (13) * Gandelsonas, M., "Semiotics and Architecture: Ideological Consumption or Theoretical Work", Opposition, No.1, 1973.
    (14) * Gandelsonas, M., "From Structure to Subject: The Formation of an Architectural Language", Oppositions, No.17, 1979.
    (15) Markus, T., eds., Order in Space and Society: Architectural Form and Its Context in the Scotttish Enlightenment, 1982, "Introduction", pp.1-24.
    (16) Markus, T., eds. Building and Power: Freedom and Control in the Origin of Modern Building Type, 1993.
    (17) Forty, Adrian, Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture, 2000.
    (18) Lee, Hee-Bong(李熙奉)(2002) “Limitation on Folk House Study”, paper presented in 2002 Seoul International Conference on East Asian Architectural History - Traditional Architecture in modern Asia (TAmA), The Korean Association of Architectural History, Seoul, October 17-19, 2002.

    注意近年在形式主義回潮趨勢下的類型學主張,並閱讀韓國學者李熙奉對濟州民居研究時的應用經驗。

     1. 4. Applications (應用)
    Select an architectural style, and report on the following: What are the characteristics of the style? who formulated them? how useful or successful has this designation proved? Remember this is historiography. We are concerned with the making of styles by historians.
    examples:
    (1) Neoclassicism: see H. Honour's book of that name, 1968.
    (2) Roman vaulted style: see W. MacDonald, The Architecture of Roman Empire, 1965 and new revised ed.' also see his new book: Hadrian's Villa and Its Legacy, 1995.

    Shingle style' stick style: see V. Scully.
    International Style: see the 1932 Hitchcock/Johnson book.
    Post-modernism:
    (3) Jencks, J., The Language of Post-Modern Architecture, 3d ed., 1981.
    (4) MacLeod, M., "Architecture and Politics in the Regain Era: From Postmodernism to Deconstructivism", Assemblage, No.8, Feb. 1989, pp.222-59.

    Others: new Brutalism, art-deco, Federal, Victorian Gothic, Ottonian, Hellenistic, Romanesque...

    Arnold, Dana, Reading Architectural History, London: Routledge 2002. (Ch.5)
    Bourdieu, Pierre, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1984.
    Vale, L., Architecture, Power and National Identity. 1992.

    認識建築史家應用建築風格的研究成果,最後,比較社會學者與近年社會理論影響下對風格的社會批判角度。

    V. Methods of Architectural History (建築史方法)
    2. Technology and Structural/ Moral Approach (技術與結構的/倫理的取向)

    (1) * Watkin, D., Morality and Architecture, 1977.
    (2) Viollet-le-Duc, E.E., Historire de L'architectur, 1863-72.
    (3) Auguste Choisy, Histoire de L'architecture, Paris, 1899.
    (4) Abraham, P., Violet-le-Duc et rationalism medieval, Paris 1934.
    (5) Banham, R., The Architecture of the Well-Tempered Environment, 1969.
    (6) Banham, R., Theory and Design in the First Machine Age, 1960.
    (7) Giedion, G., Mechanization Takes Command, 1948.
    (8) Pevsner, N., Ruskin and Viollet-le-Duc, London, 1969: and Pioneers of Modern Design, first published in 1936 and Pioneers of the Modern Movement from William Morris to Walter Gropius.
    (9) Abraham, P., Experiments in Gothic Structure, MIT 1982.

    認識現代建築運動影響下建築史學所未自覺的,對結構技術的規範性偏見;英國保守主義右翼學者大衛‧華金(David Watkin)的犀利批判特別值得注意。

    V. Methods of Architectural History (建築史方法)
    3. The Social Cultural Approach (社會文化取向)

   (1) Hauser, A., The Social History of Art, 1951.
    (2) Hauser, A., Mannerism: The Crisis of the Renaissance and the Origin of Modern Art, 1965.
    (3) Hauser, A., The Sociology of Art, 1982. (G. Origin 1974)
    (4) Hauser, A., The Philosophy of Art, 1958.
    (5) M., Girouard's books: The Victorian Country House, 1971; Sweetness and Light, 1977; Life in the English Country House, 1978; Aweetness and Light, 1977.
    (6) Arnold, Dana, Reading Architectural History, London: Routledge 2002. (Ch.4)(將Girouard與Grombrich並列)
    (7) Goldthwaite, R.A., The Building of Renaissance Florence: A Social and Economic History, 1981.
    (8) Vanelli, V., Economic dell' architecture in Roma liberale.
    (9) Mathews, T.F., The Early Churches of Constantinople, 1971.
    (10) Kostof, S., "Do Buildings Lie?".

     [Cultural Geography] 文化地理学
    Knapp, Ronald, “Asia’s Diversity & Asia’s Dwellings: A Geographer’s Perspective”, paper presented in 2002 Seoul International Conference on East Asian Architectural History - Traditional Architecture in modern Asia (TAmA), The Korean Association of Architectural History, Seoul, October 17-19, 2002.
    Knapp, Ronald, China’s Traditional Rural Architecture, 1986; The Chinese House, 1990; Chinese Landscapes: The Village as Place, 1992; China’s Walled Cities, 2000; China’s Old Dwellings, 2000; Asia’s Old Dwellings, 2003.

    這是建築史與藝術史的重要知識傳統之一,值得多閱讀並討論它們與文化地理學者共享的某些人文主義的共同遺產,羅納‧那普(Roland Knapp)的中國民居研究是一個需要做理論比較的好例子。

    V. Methods of Architectural History (建築史方法)
    4. Iconography, Symbolism, Semiotics (圖象學,象徵論,記號學)

    Panofsky, E., Studies in Iconology, 1939.
    Panofsky, E., Meaning in the Visual Art, 1955.
    Panofsky, E., Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism, 1951.
    Panofsky, E., Idea: A Concept in Art Theory, 1968.
    Panofsky, E., Perspective as Symbolic Form, 1991.
    Holly, M.A., Panofsky and the Foundations of Art History, 1984.
    Jencks, C., and G. Baird, eds. Meaning in Architecture, 1969.
    Hautecoeur, L., Mystique et architecture, symbolism of du cercle et de la coupole, 1954.
    Baldwin, Smith E., Architectural Symbolism of Imperial Rome and the Middle Ages, 1956' The Doe, A Study in the History of Ideas, 1950.
    Krautheimer, R., “Introduction to an Iconography of Medieval Architecture”, Journal of Warburg and Courtauld, No.5, 1942, pp.1-34; reprinted with postscript in Krautheimer, Studies in Early Christian, Medieval and Renaissance Art, 1969, pp.115-150.
    Grabar, A., Martyrium, Paris, 1946.
    Hersey, G.L., High Victorian Gothic, A Study in Associations

    特別注意藝術史的重要知識傳統,華堡學派厄文‧潘諾夫斯基(Erwin Panofsky)對形式的特殊性分析的貢獻。

    V. Methods of Architectural History (建築史方法)
    5. The Critical Approach (批判取向)

    Hadjinicolaou, N., Art History and Class Struggle, 1978.
    Hadjinicolaou, N., “Art History and the History of the Appreciation of Works of Art”, 1978
    Hadjinicolaou, N., “On the Ideology of Avant-gardism”, 1982.
    Hadjinicolaou, N., “Disarming 1830: A Parisian Counter Revolution”, 1981.
    Arnold, Dana, Reading Architectural History, London: Routledge 2002. (Ch.3)(將Hadjinicolaou與Summerson並列)
    Clark, T.J., The Absolute Bourgeois: Artists and Politics in France, 1848-1851, 1973.
    Clark, T.J., Image of the People: Gustave Courbet and the 1848 Revolution, 1973.
    Clark, T.J., The Painting of Modern Life: Paris in the Art of Manet and His Followers, 1984.
    Tafuri, M., The Sphere and Labyrinth 1987. "The Historical Project", 1979.
    Tafuri, M., Architecture and Utopia, 1975.
    Tafuri, M., and F. Dal Co., Modern Architecture, 1979.
    Tafuri, M., History of Italian Architecture, 1944-1985, 1989.
    Tafuri, M. Interpreting the Renaissance: Princes, Cities, Architects, 2006.
    Tafuri, M. and Leach A. Manfredo Tafuri: Choosing History, 2008.
    “Interview: Manfredo Tafuri”, Transition, Vol.2, No.3/4, 1981.
    Lipstadt, Helene, and Harvey Mendelsohn, "Philosophy, History, and Autobiography: Manfredo Tafuri and the 'Unsurpassed Lesson' of Le Corbusier", Assemblage, No.22, Dec. 1993, 58-103.
    Porphrios, Demetri, Sources of Modern Eclecticism, 1982.
    Cacciari, Massimo, Architecture and Nihilism: On the Philosophy of Modern Architecture, 1993.
    Wigley, Mark, The Architecture of Deconstruction: Derrida's Haunt, 1993.
    Benedikt, Michael, Deconstructing the Kimbell, 1991.
    Ockman, Joan et al., eds. Architecture Criticism Ideology, 1985.
    Ockman, Joan et al., eds. Architecture production, 1988.

    for the second category : the Historian and Politics 第二类:历史学家和政治

    Millon, H.A, “The Role of History of Architecture in Fascist Italy”, JSAH, No.24, Jan. 1965.
    Nochlin/Millon, eds. Art and Architecture in the Service of Politics 1978, papers by Stapleford, Westfall, von Moos, Searing, Kostof.
    Miller Lane, B., Architecture and Politics in Germeny, 1918-1945, 1968.
    Kostof, S., The Third Rome, 1973.
    Kopp, A., Town and Revolution, Soviet Architecture and City Planning, 1917-1935, 1970. (Original pub. in French in 1967)
    von Simson, O., Sacred Fortress, Byzantine Art and Stratecraft in Ravanna, 1948.
    Doordan, D.P., “The Political Content in Italian Architecture during the Fascist Era”, Art Journal, Summer 1983, pp.121-131.

    主要是1970年代社會運動衝擊下新馬克斯主義對建築史學的影響,以及,建築史研究中對政治議題的爭議,值得討論它對政治向來採取不發言的社會與知識的脈絡。要有能力區分庸俗馬克斯主義與馬克斯主義的影響,尤其是馬克斯主義對史學的價值。注意對空間-社會轉化過程的歷史動態(力)分析,如何可以補社會科學之不足,形成對社會科學的批判。最後,做為歷史研究方法,馬克斯主義取向做為討論“現代”的起點,其方法論上的優勢值得留意。

    5.1 Microhistory (微觀史學)
    由於Manfredo Tufuri的原因,我們在這一部份可以延伸到義大利微觀史學,以Carlo Ginzburg為代表的史家,對農民與工匠手藝人的細微線索的探究:

    李尚仁,“如何書寫被排除者的歷史——金士伯格論傅柯的瘋狂使研究”,《科技、醫療與社會》,第三期,2005年3月,頁:157-227。
    傅柯,《古典時代瘋狂史》,台北:時報,1998。(林志明中譯)
    Ginzburg, C., The Night Battles, 1983. (有中譯)
    Ginzburg, C. and R. Rosenthal, Ecstasies: Deciphering the Witches’ Sabbath, 1991.
    Ginzburg, C. et al., The Cheese and the Worms, 1992.
    Ginzburg, C. et al., Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method, 1992.
    Ginzburg, C. and A. Shugaar, The Judge and the Historian, 1999
    Ginzburg, C., History, Rhetoric, and Proof, 1999.
    Ginzburg, C., No Island Is an Island, 2000.
    Ginzburg, C., Wooden Eyes: Nine Reflections on Distance, 2002.

    VI. Theory, History and Criticism (理論,歷史與批評)

    Maharaj, Jayant, and Peter Manning, “Aesthetics and Architectural Criticism”, AAO, Vol.11, No.4, Fall 1979, pp.49-55.
    Zevi, Bruno, “The Role of Critic of Architecture”, AAO, Vol.11, No.4, Fall 1979, pp.56-7.
    Dickens, Peter, “The Hut and the Machine: Towards a Social Theory of Architecture”, Architectural Design, No.1/2, 1981, pp.18-24.
    Ockman, Joan et al., eds. Architecture Criticism Ideology, 1985.
    Ockman, Joan et al., eds. Architectureproduction, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton Architectural Press, 1988.
    MacLeod, Mary, “On Criticism”, Places, Vol.4, No.1, 1987, pp.4-6.
    Arnold, Dana, Reading Architectural History, London: Routledge 2002.
    Borden, Iain, and David Kunster, eds. Architecture and the Sites of History: Interpretations of Buildings and Cities, New York: Whitney Library of Design, 1995
    Borden, Iain, et al. eds. Strangely Familiar: Narratives of Architecture in the City, 1996.
    Miles, Malcoln, Tim Hall and Iain Borden, eds. The City Cultures Reader, London: Routledge, 2000.
    Rendell, Jane, Barbara Penner and Iain Borden, eds. Gender Space Architecture: An Interdisciplinary Introduction, London: Routledge, 2000.
    Borden, Ian, Joe Kerr, Jane Rendell, with Alicia Pivaro, eds. The Unknown City: Contesting Architecture and Social Space, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2001.
    Borden, Iain, and Jane Rendell, Intersections: Architectural Histories and Critical Theories, London: Routledge, 2000.

    注意:史學、文化研究與社會理論間近年的互動與新趨勢。

    鄭時齡,2001,《建築批評學》,北京:中國建築工業出版社。

    (来源:http://www.douban.com/note/36715797/

发表评论:

◎欢迎参与讨论,请在这里发表您的看法、交流您的观点。

日历

手机二维码访问

建筑学学术资源发现

最近发表

最新评论及回复

Powered By Z-Blog 1.8 Arwen Build 90619  Theme By Bokezhuti.cn

Copyright;2009-2009 blog.hit.edu.cn All Rights Reserved 哈工大网络与信息中心